%40تخفیف

Investigating the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Thinking Styles and English Proficiency among Iranian EFL Learners

تعداد101صفحه در فایل word

Department of English Language and Literature

 

Investigating the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Thinking Styles and English Proficiency among Iranian EFL Learners

M.A. Thesis

ABSTRACT

Emotional intelligence and thinking styles are two main components which are directly related to the learners’ success in English language learning. To do this, the primary purpose of the current study is to discover the relationship between emotional intelligence, thinking styles and English proficiency. To this end, a 133-item emotional intelligence questionnaire, a 24-item thinking styles questionnaire and 50-item Nelson proficiency test were distributed among 90 Iranian EFL leaners (42 males and 48 female) majoring in English Language and Literature, teaching English, and language translation in the university of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan Azad university and Maritime university of Chabahar. The data were analyzed through Pearson correlation coefficient and an independent sample t-test. The results showed that there was no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and thinking styles. In addition, the results of the study revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between emotional intelligence and English proficiency. Further, the results indicated no significant relationship between thinking styles and English proficiency; it was also inferred that there was no significant difference between males’ and females’ thinking styles.

Keywords: Emotional Intelligence, Thinking Styles, English Proficiency, EFL learners

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Page

ACKNOWLEDGEMNETS …………………………………………. i

ABSTRACT………………………………………………………..… ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………… iii

LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………. viii

LIST OF APPENDICES………………………………………………. ix

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……….………………….……………… x

CHAPTER 1. 1

INTRODUCTION.. 1

1.2 Background of the study. 1

1.3 Statement of the problem and purpose of the study. 2

1.4 Significance of the study. 4

1.5 Research Questions. 4

1.5.1 Question 1. 5

1.5.2 Question 2. 5

1.5.3 Question 3. 5

1.5.4 Question 4. 5

1.6 Research Hypotheses. 5

1.6.1 Hypothesis 1. 5

1.6.2 Hypothesis 2. 5

1.6.3 Hypothesis 3. 6

1.6.4 Hypothesis 4. 6

1.7 Definition of the Key Terms. 6

1.7.1 Emotional intelligence. 6

1.7.2 Thinking styles. 6

1.7.3 English Proficiency. 6

1.8 Limitations of the Study. 7

Chapter 2. 8

REVIEW OF LITERATURE. 8

2.1 Introduction. 8

2.2 Emotional Intelligence. 8

2.2.1 History of Emotional intelligence. 8

2.2.2 Definitions of Emotional Intelligence. 9

2.2.3 Three Models of Emotional Intelligence. 11

2.2.3.1 The Ability Model: 11

2.2.3.2 The Trait Model of Emotional Intelligence. 11

2.2.3.3 Mixed Models of Emotional Intelligence. 12

2.2.4 Current Measures of EQ.. 12

2.2.4.1 Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale. 12

2.2.4.2 Emotional Competency Inventory. 13

2.2.4.3 Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory. 13

2.2.5 Emotional Intelligence (EQ) and IQ.. 14

2.2.6 The Relationship between EQ and IQ.. 15

2.2.7 Emotional Intelligence and its Implication for Educational Field  15

2.2.8 Previous Studies on Emotional intelligence. 18

2.3 Thinking Styles. 21

2.3.1 Background of Thinking Styles. 21

2.3.2 Mental Self-Government Theory (MSG) 22

2.3.3.2.1 Functions of mental self-Government: 22

2.3.2.2 Forms. 23

2.3.2.3 Levels of Mental Self-Government 24

2.3.2.4 Scopes. 25

2.3.2.5 Trend. 25

2.3.3 The importance of thinking styles in education. 27

2.3.4 Some general characteristics of styles. 28

2.3.5 Convergent and Divergent Thinking. 29

2.3.6 Productive and reproductive thinking. 30

2.3.7 Basic Research on the Thinking Styles. 30

2.4 English proficiency. 34

2.4.1 Previous Studies on English proficiency. 37

CHAPTER 3. 39

METHODOLOGY.. 39

3.1 Introduction. 39

3.2 Participants. 39

3.3 Instrumentation. 39

3.3.1 Bar-on Emotional Quotient Inventory. 40

3.3.2 Thinking Styles Inventory. 40

3.3.3 English language Proficiency. 41

3.4 Procedure. 41

3.5 Data analysis. 42

CHAPTER 4. 43

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS. 43

4.1 Introduction. 43

4.2 Testing the Research Hypotheses. 44

4.2.1 Research Hypothesis 1. 44

4.2.1.1 Descriptive Statistics. 44

4.2.2 Research Hypothesis 2. 47

4.2.3 Research Hypothesis 3. 49

4.2.4 Research Hypothesis 4. 50

Statistical Analysis. 51

4.3 Discussion of the Findings. 53

4.3.1 Research question 1. 53

4.4.2 Research Question 2. 55

4.4.3 Research Question 3. 57

4.4.4 Research Question 4. 57

CHAPTER 5. 60

SUMMARY, IMPLICATIONS, SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AND CONCLUSION.. 60

5.1 Introduction. 60

5.2 Summary of the Study. 60

5.2.1 Research question 1. 61

5.2.2 Research question 2. 61

5.2.3 Research question 3. 61

5.2.4 Research question 4. 61

5.3 Implications of the Study. 62

5.3.1 Theoretical Implications. 62

5.3.2 Pedagogical Implications. 63

5.4 Suggestions for Further Research. 64

5.5 Conclusion. 64

REFERENCES…………………………………………………….72

APPENDICES……………………………………………………..86

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                                                              Page

4.1 Descriptive statistics for Emotional Intelligence and its components, Thinking Styles and English Proficiency……………49

4.2 Pearson correlation for Emotional Intelligence and Thinking Styles…………………………………………………………………50

4.3 Pearson correlation for Emotional Intelligence with English Proficiency ……………………………………………………………52

4.4 Pearson correlation for Thinking Styles with English Proficiency ……………………..………………………………………………..53

4.5 Descriptive Statistics of Thinking Styles Scores of Males and Females………………..……………………………………………..55

4.6 Independent Sample t-test for Gender Differences in Thinking Styles…………………………………………………………………56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix                                                                                      Page

  1. Nelson Proficiency Test…………..……………………….……87

  2. EQ Questionnaire…………………………………………..……94

  3. Sternberg-Wagner Thinking Styles Questionnaire…………………….98

 

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo