%40تخفیف

The Relationship between Interpersonal and Intra-personal Intelligences and Vocabulary Learning Strategies: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners

تعداد90صفحه در فایل word

Department of English Language

 

M.A Thesis

 

The Relationship between Interpersonal and Intra-personal Intelligences and Vocabulary Learning Strategies: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners

 

Abstract

The present study aimed at finding out whether there existed a relationship between EFL learners’ dominant intelligence and vocabulary learning strategies they use. The first research question posed was related to the preferred vocabulary learning strategies used by EFL learners. It was concluded that Iranian EFL learners mostly preferred intrapersonal vocabulary learning strategies. The second research question focused on the type of dominant intelligence among Iranian EFL learners. The results indicate that Iranian EFL learners were mostly intra-personally dominant. In the third research question, the correlation between interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences introduced by Gardner (1983) and vocabulary learning strategies introduced by Kudo (1999) was calculated. The statistics showed that each one of the vocabulary learning strategies could be categorized as either interpersonal or intrapersonal based on the degree and significance of the correlation each one had with either interpersonal or intrapersonal statements in the questionnaire. Finally, a retrospective Think-Aloud Protocol (TAP) procedure was conducted. The results showed that EFL learners mostly preferred using intra-personal vocabulary learning strategies than interpersonal ones. Therefore, if the learners know the appropriate vocabulary learning strategies, they will be able to learn and retain the meaning of the new vocabularies much easier.

Keywords: Interpersonal intelligence, Intrapersonal intelligence, Vocabulary strategies

Table of Contents

Title                                                                                      Page

CHAPTER 1:  INTRODUCTION                                                                                         

1.1      Background to the Study. 9

1.2      Statement of the Problem.. 10

1.3      Research Questions and Hypotheses. 11

1.4      Significance and Purpose of the Study. 12

1.5      Definition of Key Terms. 12

CHAPTER 2:  REVIEW OF LITERATURE                                                                          

2.1      Introduction. 14

2.1.1      Vocabulary Learning Strategies. 19

2.1.2      Multiple Intelligences. 22

2.2      Summary. 24

CHAPTER 3:  METHODOLOGY

3.1      Introduction. 26

3.2      Design. 27

3.3      Participants. 27

3.4      Instruments. 27

3.5      Procedure. 29

CHAPTER 4:  RESULTS

4.1      Introduction. 31

4.2      Analysis of the Results. 32

4.3      Think-Aloud Protocol (TAP) 34

4.4      SUMMARY.. 35

CHAPTER 5:  DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION and IMPLICATIONS

5.1      Restatement of the problem.. 36

5.2      Discussion. 36

5.2.1      First Research Question and Hypothesis: 36

5.2.2      Second Research Question and Hypothesis: 37

5.2.3      Third Research Question and Hypothesis: 38

5.3      Conclusion. 38

5.4      Implications. 38

5.5      Limitations. 38

5.6      Suggestions for Further Study. 39

References  40

Appendix  43

Tables

Title                                                                                      Page

Table 1. Flesch readability chart 42

Table 2. Preferred vocabulary learning strategies. 61

Table 3. Strategies with lower bound higher than 3.00. 47

Table 4. Two-sample t-Test results. 48

Table 5. The correlation analysis results. 63

Table 6. Pearson correlation matrix. 74

Table 7. Pearson correlation matrix (Continued) 83

Table 8. Pearson Correlation matrix (Continued) 93

Table 9. Pearson correlation matrix (Continued) 102

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo