%40تخفیف

Preparation of a Protein- and an Aptamer-conjugated Nanomaterial and Their Application in Biosensing and Immunosensing & Electrocatalytic Activity of Carbon Electrodes Modified by Nanomaterials and Molecular Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

تعداد176صفحه در فایل word

Ph.D. Dissertation in Analytical Chemistry

 

Preparation of a Protein- and an Aptamer-conjugated Nanomaterial and Their Application in Biosensing and Immunosensing

&

Electrocatalytic Activity of Carbon Electrodes Modified by Nanomaterials and Molecular Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

ABSTRACT

In the first study, a sensitive and highly selective dual-aptamer-based sandwich immunosensor was reported for detection of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). In this bioassay system a biotinylated primary anti-S. aureus aptamer is immobilized on streptavidin coated magnetic beads via biotin-streptavidin recognition, which serves as a capture probe. A secondary anti-S. aureus aptamer-conjugated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs ) reports the target detection. In the presence of target bacterium, an aptamer-bacterium-aptamer sandwich complex is formed on the magnetic bead surface and the electrochemical signal of AgNPs followed through anodic stripping voltammetry as the analytical signal to detect S. aureus. The proposed sandwich assay benefits from advantageous of a sandwich assay for increased specificity, magnetic beads as carriers of affinity ligands for fast magnetic separation, AgNPs for signal amplification and an electrochemical stripping voltammetry read-out for a sensitive detection. The electrochemical immunosensor has an extended dynamic range from10 to 1´106 cfu/mL with a low detection limit of 1.0 cfu/mL (S/N=3). Furthermore, the possible interferences of two analog bacteria, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli, were studied with the detection of S. aureus. The results show that these bacteria would not interfere with the detection of target bacterium. To assess the general applicability of this sensor, the quantification of S. aureus was investigated in two water samples. The results were compared to the experimental results obtained from a plate-counting method, which demonstrated an acceptable consistency.

In the second study, direct electrochemistry of Cytochrome c (Cyt c) which was adsorbed on the surface of graphene modified electrode was investigated by cyclic voltammetry. Because of the ultrahigh electron mobility of graphene and its unique surface properties such as one-atom thickness and irreversible protein adsorption at surfaces, graphene-based materials might serve as an ideal platform for accommodating proteins and facilitating protein electron transfer. Cyt c on the surface of electrode maintains its bioactivity and shows an enzyme-like activity for the reduction of Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the wide concentration range from 2µ M to 4mM with a detection limit of 0.4 µM, displaying a potential application for the fabrication of novel biosensors to sense H2O2.

 

In final part, electrocatalytic activity of some carbon electrodes modified by nanomaterials and molecular catalysts were studied for hydrogen evolution reaction. Hydrogen as a fuel source has received attention from researchers globally due to its potential to replace fossil-based fuels for energy production. Research is being performed on hydrogen production and utilization methods to make its use economically feasible relative to current energy sources. This part, examines electrocatalytic hydrogen production from water by electrolysis. Efforts have been made in electrocatalyst development and performance evaluation. Their performance was evaluated by various electrochemical techniques such as cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry and etc.

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Content                                                       page

CHAPTER ONE   1

  1. Introduction 2

1.1. Aptamers. 2

1.2. The SELEX process. 5

1.3. Electrochemical assays. 6

1.4. Aptamer immobilization. 7

1.5. Aptasensors for pathogenic microorganisms detection. 8

1.5.1. Electrochemical aptasensors. 9

1.6. Biotin-Streptavidin affinity. 9

1.6.1. Streptavidin. 10

1.7. Nanoparticles. 11

1.7.1. Silver nanoparticles. 12

1.7.2. Palladium nanoparticles. 13

1.7.3. Bimetallic nanoparticles. 13

1.7.3.1. Au–Pd bimetallic nanoparticles. 13

1.8. Staphylococcus aureus. 14

1.9. Graphene. 15

1.9.1. Graphene oxide. 16

1.9.2. Reduced graphene oxide. 17

1.9.2.1. Electrochemical reduction. 18

1.10.  Cytochrome c. 18

1.10.1. Cytochrome c as a biocatalyst 19

1.11.  Graphene-based enzymatic electrodes. 20

1.11.1. Cytochrome c biosensor 21

1.12.  Hydrogen peroxide. 21

1.13.  Hydrogen: properties and characteristics. 22

1.14.  Hydrogen as an energy carrier 24

1.15.  Methods of hydrogen production. 26

1.15.1. Production of renewable non-carbogenic hydrogen. 28

1.16.  Water electrolysis. 29

1.16.1. The need for new electrode materials. 32

1.16.2. Hydrogen evolution reaction. 34

1.17.  Carbon and carbon composite electrodes. 34

1.17.1. Carbon paste electrode. 35

1.17.2. Glassy carbon electrode. 35

1.17.3. Ceramic electrodes based on sol–gel process. 36

1.17.3.1. Sol–gel derived carbon ceramic electrode by microwave irradiation. 36

1.18.  Metallophthalocyanine. 37

1.18.1. Hypothetical catalytic process promoted by “MPcs”. 38

CHAPTER TWO   40

  1. Literature review 41

2.1. Aptamers for bacteria detection. 41

2.2. Electrochemistry of Cytochrome c. 42

2.3. Detection of H2O2 with Cytochrome c. 44

2.4. Electrocatalytic hydrogen production. 47

2.5. Metalophthalocyanines as molecular catalysts in HER.. 50

CHAPTER THREE   51

  1. Experimental 52

3.1. Preparation of a protein- and an aptamer-conjugated nanomaterial and their application in biosensing and immunosensing. 52

3.1.1. Aptamer-conjugated silvernanoparticles for electrochemical dual-Aptamer-based sandwich detection of staphylococcus aureus. 52

3.1.1.1. Chemicals and reagents. 52

3.1.1.2. Apparatus. 53

3.1.1.3. Procedure. 54

3.1.1.4. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles. 54

3.1.1.4.1.  Preparation of Ag-Aptamer 55

3.1.1.5. Assay Protocol 55

3.1.2. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of Cytochrome c at graphen modified glassy carbon electrode for the reduction of Hydrogen peroxide. 57

3.1.2.1. Reagents. 57

3.1.2.2. Apparatus. 57

3.1.2.3. Procedure. 58

3.1.2.3.1.  Synthesis of reduced GO.. 58

3.1.2.3.2.  Preparation of modified GC electrode. 58

3.2. Electrocatalytic Activity of Carbon Electrodes Modified by Nanomaterials and Molecular Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. 59

3.2.1. High electrocatalytic effect of Au-Pd alloy nanoparticles electrodeposited on microwave assisted sol–gel-derived carbon ceramic electrode for hydrogen evolution reaction. 59

3.2.1.1. Reagents and apparatus. 59

3.2.1.2. Electrode preparation. 60

3.2.2. A facile one-step electrochemical preparation of graphene–Pd nanocomposite as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. 61

3.2.2.1. Reagents and apparatus. 61

3.2.2.2. Electrode preparation. 62

3.2.3. Electrocatalytic behavior of carbon paste electrode modified with metal phthalocyanines nanoparticles towards the hydrogen evolution. 62

3.2.3.1. Apparatus. 62

3.2.3.2. Materials and solutions. 63

3.2.3.3. Synthesis of nanoZnPc and nanoNiPc. 63

3.2.3.4. Fabrication of the modified electrode. 64

CHAPTER FOUR   65

  1. Results and discussion 66

4.1. Preparation of a protein- and an aptamer-conjugated nanomaterial and their application in biosensing and immunosensing. 66

4.1.1. Aptamer-conjugated silver nanoparticles for electrochemical dual-Aptamer-based sandwich detection of staphylococcus aureus. 66

4.1.1.1. Introduction. 66

4.1.1.2. Optimization of assay condition. 69

4.1.1.2.1.  Optimization of the primary aptamer concentration. 70

4.1.1.2.2.  Optimization of the Ag-aptamer concentration. 71

4.1.1.3. Analytical Application. 72

4.1.1.4. Selectivity of the assay. 74

4.1.1.5. Real sample analysis. 75

4.1.1.6. Conclusion. 75

4.1.2. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of Cytochrome c at a graphene-modified electrode for the reduction of hydrogen peroxide. 76

4.1.2.1. Introduction. 76

4.1.2.2. Direct electron transfer of Cyt c on modified electrode. 78

4.1.2.3. Electrocatalysis of Cyt c-nafion-GR/GC electrode to reduction of H2O2 82

4.1.2.4. Conclusion. 87

4.2. Electrocatalytic Activity of Carbon Electrodes Modified by Nanomaterials and Molecular Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. 88

4.2.1. High electrocatalytic effect of Au-Pd alloy nanoparticles electrodeposited on microwave assisted sol–gel-derived carbon ceramic electrode for hydrogen evolution reaction. 88

4.2.1.1. Introduction. 88

4.2.1.2. SEM image. 91

4.2.1.3. XRD analysis. 92

4.2.1.4. EDX and ICP analyses. 93

4.2.1.5. Electrochemical characterization of alloy surface. 94

4.2.1.6. Real surface area determination. 96

4.2.1.7. Electrocatalytic activity of nanoparticle modified electrode for HER.. 97

4.2.1.8. Kinetic parameters and mechanism.. 101

4.2.1.9. Stability of Au(1)Pd(3) modified MWCCE.. 104

4.2.1.10. Conclusion. 105

4.2.2. A facile one-step electrochemical preparation of graphene–Pd nanocomposite as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. 106

4.2.2.1. Introduction. 106

4.2.2.2. SEM image. 108

4.2.2.3. Electrochemical characterization of different modified electrode. 109

4.2.2.4. Effect of the thickness of the graphene-Pd nanocomposite film.. 111

4.2.2.5. Real surface area determination. 112

4.2.2.6. Electrocatalytic activity of the different modified electrodes for HER   113

4.2.2.7. Kinetic parameters and mechanism.. 115

4.2.2.8. Stability and renewability studies. 117

4.2.2.9. Conclusion. 119

4.2.3. Electrocatalytic behavior of carbon paste electrode modified with metal phthalocyanines nanoparticles towards the hydrogen evolution. 120

4.2.3.1. Introduction. 120

4.2.3.2. SEM images. 122

4.2.3.3. Electorcatalytic activity. 123

4.2.3.4. Electrocatalytic Activity of the different MPc at various pHs. 127

4.2.3.5. Conclusion. 130

  1. References 131

 

 

 

 

Caption of Figures

Figure ‎1‑1The SELEX process[13]. 5

Figure ‎1‑2 Standard nucleic acid modifications used for aptamer immobilization. 8

Figure ‎1‑3 Biotin structure. 10

Figure ‎1‑4 Streptavidin tetramer with 2 biotins bound. 10

Figure ‎1‑5 Graphene as a mother of all graphitic forms. Graphene is a 2-D building material for carbon materials with other dimensions including zero dimensions (fullerenes), one dimension (carbon nanotubes) and three dimensions (graphite). 16

Figure ‎1‑6 Graphene  and  graphene  oxide  structures. 17

Figure ‎1‑7 Three-dimensional structure of cytochrome c (green) with a heme molecule coordinating a central Iron atom (orange). 19

Figure ‎1‑8 Relative energy consumption in the production of hydrogen from different materials at the present level of technology. 27

Figure ‎1‑9 Relative quantities of raw materials presently used for hydrogen production. 27

Figure ‎1‑10 Direct (shaded rectangles) and electrolytic routes to production of hydrogen using renewable energy sources [98]. 29

Figure ‎1‑11 Production of hydrogen from an electrolyzer. 31

Figure ‎1‑12 Metallophthalocyanine complex. 38

Figure ‎1‑13 Scheme of a catalytic process promoted with MPcs based molecular electrode [115]. 39

Figure ‎2‑1 Catalytic centers of [FeFe]- and [NiFe]-hydrogenases. 49

Figure ‎3‑1 TEM image (a) and UV–Vis spectrum (b) of the synthesized silver nanoparticles. 55

Figure ‎4‑1 Optimization of the primary aptamer concentration.The data points representthe average and standard deviation of measurements obtained from three independenttests. 71

Figure ‎4‑2 Optimization of the secondary aptamer concentration.The data points represent the average and standard deviation of measurements obtained from three independent tests. 72

Figure ‎4‑3 (a) Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammograms of AgNPs in the presence of different concentrations of S.aureus. (b) The linear relationship between the peak current signal of AgNPs and concentration of S.aureus. 73

Figure ‎4‑4 The intensity of the signals measured for S.aureus (a) S. epidermidis (b) and E. coli (c). 74

Figure ‎4‑5 Cyclic voltammograms of a bare GC electrode (a), nafion-rGO/GC electrode (b) Cyt c on nafion/GC electrode (c), and Cyt c on nafion-rGO/GC electrode (d). All the voltammograms are recorded in a PBS buffer pH 7 at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. 79

Figure ‎4‑6 (a) Cyclic voltammograms of Cyt c at differentscan rates: 2, 4, 6, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 mV/s from a to i. (b) Relationship between the Cyt c redox peak currents (Ip,a and Ip,c) vs. the scan rates. 81

Figure ‎4‑7 CVs of Cyt c-nafion-GR/GC electrode in the absence (a) and in the presence of H2O2 with a concentration of 1000 µM (b). 83

Figure ‎4‑8 (A) CVs of a Cyt c on a nafion-rGO/GC electrode in a set of H2O2 solutions with different concentrations (0, 2, 4, 8, 10, 20,50, 100, 300,500, 700, 1000µM). (B) Linear calibration curve for H2O2 sensor. All the voltammograms are recorded in a PBS pH 7 at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. 84

Figure ‎4‑9 Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of Pd-MWCCE (A), Au-MWCCE (B), Au(1)Pd(3)-MWCCE (C) and bare MWCCE (D). 91

Figure ‎4‑10 XRD patterns of bare, Pd , Au(1)Pd(3) and Au modified MWCCE from bottom to the top. 92

Figure ‎4‑11 EDX spectra of (a) Au(1)Pd(3), (b) Au(1)Pd(1) and (c) Au(3)Pd(1) modified MWCCE. 93

Figure ‎4‑12 CVs of a) Au(1)Pd(3), b) Pd and c) Au  NPs-modified MWCCE with a scan rate of 100 m V s-1 in 0.5 M H2SO4. 95

Figure ‎4‑13 Comparative CVs of (a) bare (MWCCE), (b) Au,(c) Pd, (d) Au(3)Pd(1), (e) Au(1)Pd(1) and (f) Au(1)Pd(3) modified MWCCE in 0.1 M HCl, Scan rate: 100 mV s-1 , deposition time:60s. 98

Figure ‎4‑14 CVs of Au(1)Pd(3)-MWCCE  with the deposition time periods of 0s, 15s, 30s, 45s, 60s 75s and 100s , in 0.1M HCl at 100 mV s-1. 99

Figure ‎4‑15 Chronoamprometrics responses of (a) bare (MWCCE), (b) Au,(c) Pd, (d) Au(3)Pd(1), (e) Au(1)Pd(1) and (f) Au(1)Pd(3) modified MWCCE in 0.1 M HCl, Ei = 0.0 V and Ef = -0.6 V. 100

Figure ‎4‑16 Tafel plots for HER at (a) bare (MWCCE), (b) Au,(c) Pd, (d) Au(3)Pd(1), (e) Au(1)Pd(1) and (f) Au(1)Pd(3) modified MWCCE in 0.1 M HCl. 102

Figure ‎4‑17 Chronopotentiometric curve for the HER on Au(1)Pd(3) modified MWCCE in 0.1 M HCL at two current densities of 3 and 5 mA cm-2. 105

Figure ‎4‑18 SEM images of (A) Pd/CPE and (B) rGO-Pd/CPE. 108

Figure ‎4‑19 CVs of electrochemical reduction of a) GO, b) Pd and c) co-deposition of GO and Pd in PBS (pH=4) at a scan rate of 50 mVS-1. 110

Figure ‎4‑20 CVs of bare and modified CPEs at 5mM K3Fe(CN)6  and 0.1 M KCl. 111

Figure ‎4‑21 Proton reduction current of rGO-Pd/CPE  at -0.6 V as a function of  N in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution and scan rate of 50 mV S-1. 112

Figure ‎4‑22 Comparative CVs of (a) bare (CPE), (b) rGO/CPE (c) Pd/CPE and (d) rGO-Pd/CPE in 0.5 M H2SO4 and Scan rate of 50 mV s-1. 113

Figure ‎4‑23 Tafel plots for HER at (a) bare (CPE), (b) rGO/CPE (c) Pd/CPE and (d) rGO-Pd/CPE in 0.5 M H2SO4. 116

Figure ‎4‑24 CA curve at -0.3 V for the HER on (a) Pd/CPE and (b) rGO-Pd/CPE in 0.5 M H2SO4. 119

Figure ‎4‑25 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of bulk A) ZnPc C) NiPc and nano B) ZnPc D) NiPc. 123

Figure ‎4‑26 Comparative CVs of bare (CPE), ZnPc and nanoZnPc modified CPE in aqueous phosphate buffer solution (A) pH = 1.30. (B) pH = 7.00  (C) pH = 10. Scan rate: 100 mV s-1. 125

Figure ‎4‑27 Comparative CVs of bare, NiPc and nanoNiPcmodified electrodes in aqueous phosphate buffer solution (A) pH = 1.30. (B) pH = 7.00  (C) pH = 10. Scan rate: 100 mV s-1. 126

Figure ‎4‑28 Chronoamperometric (CA) responses of (A) bare, ZnPc and nanoZnPc modified electrodes and (B) bare, niPc and nanoNiPcmodified electrodes in 0.1 mol dm-3 aqueous phosphate buffer solution at pH 7.0. Ei = 0.0 V and Ef = -0.8 V. 129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Caption of Tables

Table ‎1‑1 Comparison of aptamers and antibodies based of different characteristics. 3

Table ‎4‑1 Comparison between the results obtained from the analysis of real water  samples using the proposed bioassay and classical counting methods. 75

Table ‎4‑2 Comparison the characteristics of the proposed method with the other methods reported in literature. 86

Table ‎4‑3 The amount of electrodeposited of NPs on MWCCE and the weight percentage of NPs in different alloys that are estimated from ICP and EDX analysis. 94

Table ‎4‑4 Comparison of the obtained results for Au(1)Pd(1)-MWCCE with results presented by other research group toward HER. 101

Table ‎4‑5 Onset potential and Kinetic parameters for HER at modified and bare MWCCE. 103

Table ‎4‑6 Analysis of the CV responses of the bare and modified electrodes in 0.5M H2SO4 toward HER. 114

Table ‎4‑7 Kinetic parameters for HER at bare and modified electrodes. 117

Table ‎4‑8 Analysis of the CV response of the bare and modified electrodes to represent the electrocatalytic activites of the nano MPC at different pHs. 124

Table ‎4‑9 Comparative current of the bare and modified electrodes to represent the electrocatalytic activites of the nano MPC at pH=7 with CA data at t=1.2(s). 129

Table ‎4‑10 Comparative exchange current (A) of nano and bulky modified electrodes in aqueous phosphate buffer solution at different pH. 130

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo