Index
Title Number
Chapter I:Introduction to Safety |
15 |
1-1- Introduction |
16 |
1-2 – HSE History in Iran |
17 |
1-3 – The general division of HSE |
17 |
1-3-1 – HSE management system |
18 |
1-3-2 – Engineering HSE |
19 |
1-4 – the cost of lack of attention to safety issues and reduce the safety factor |
19 |
1 -5 – safety impact on the organizations financial balance |
19 |
1-6 – HSE Integrated Management System |
19 |
1-6-1 – an audit |
20 |
1-6-2 – Continual improvement |
20 |
1-6-3 – Hazard |
20 |
1-6-4 – identify risk |
20 |
1-6-5 – Event |
20 |
1-6-6 – non-compliance |
20 |
1-6-7 – Risk |
20 |
1-6-8 – risk tolerance |
20 |
1-6-9 – risk assessment |
21 |
1-7 – the most important elements of management systems1-7-1 – leadership and commitment |
21 |
1-7-2 – Policy and Strategic Goals |
21 |
1-7-3 – organize, assign resources and documentation |
22 |
1-7-4 – Risk management and assessment |
22 |
1-7-5 – plan |
23 |
1-7-6 – Implementation and Monitoring |
23 |
1 -8 – to destroy or remove the risk |
23 |
1-9 – limiting risk |
23 |
1-10 – a variety of assessment methods and risk identification |
24 |
1-11- Method HAZOP |
24 |
1-12 – Introduction to Software |
24 |
1-12-1-PHA Pro |
25 |
1-12-2-FMEA |
25 |
1-12-3-PHAST1-13 – Conclusion |
25 |
Chapter Two:HAZOP recipes |
26 |
2-1 – Introduction |
27 |
2-2 – The risk of HAZOP studies |
28 |
2-2-1 – identify the risks |
29 |
2-2-2 – Qualitative Risk Analysis |
29 |
2-2-3 – Quantitative Risk Analysis |
29 |
2-2-4 – risk assessment |
29 |
2-3 – risk analysis |
29 |
2-4 – Statistical models and systematic methods for risk analysis |
29 |
2-5 – decision-making process in risk management |
30 |
2-6 – The optimal method for dealing with risks |
30 |
2-7 – Follow-up results of previous steps in order to coordinate and exercise greater control2-8 – Factors for Success in risk assessment |
303030 |
2-9 – the kind of results needed |
31 |
2-10 – Parameters influencing the type of information for risk assessment studies |
31 |
2-11 – characteristics of the units or processes |
31 |
2-11-1 – type process |
31 |
2-11-2 – Type of operation |
31 |
2-11-3 – risks inherent in the process |
32 |
2-12 – The two groups are required to perform risk assessments in the evaluation sessions |
32 |
2-13 – decision making techniques for risk assessment |
32 |
2-14 – The risk of HAZOP studies |
33 |
2-14-1 – individual risk |
33 |
2-14-2 – occupational risk |
34 |
2-14-3 – Social Risk |
34 |
2-15 – risk acceptance criteria |
34 |
2-16 – Risk Matrix |
34 |
2-17 – Definitions of Risk |
35 |
2-18 – asymmetric risk matrix |
36 |
2-19 – Analysis (HAZOP) |
36 |
2-20 – The definitions in HAZOP |
37 |
2-20-1 – nodes |
37 |
2-20-2 – operational stage |
37 |
2-20-3 – purpose or intent |
37 |
2-20-4 – Guide word |
37 |
2-20-5 – process parameters |
37 |
2-20-6 – reasons |
37 |
2-20-7 – Aftermath |
38 |
2-20-8 – safety equipment |
38 |
2-20-9 – recommendations or actions (Action / Recommendation) |
38 |
2-21 – defining the objectives, issues and areas of study |
39 |
2-22 – elected members of study team |
39 |
2-23 – providing the necessary information for HAZOP studies |
40 |
2-24 – planning meetings, HAZOP team |
40 |
2-25 – Poor problem-solving tasks to minimize the group leader |
40 |
2-26 – Methods of Reporting Results |
41 |
2-27 – Conclusion |
41 |
Chapter Three:Overall understanding of the operation unit 3of Gachsaran |
42 |
3-1 – Introduction |
43 |
3-2 – Utilities |
44 |
3-3 – oil production |
44 |
3-4 – production and gas injection |
45 |
3-5 – Gachsaran facility operation unit 4 is divided3-5-1-1 – Part I (separation) |
45 |
3-5-1-2 – causes separation of application equipment |
45 |
3-5-1-4 – Instrumentation and control devices installed on the separator |
46 |
3-5-1-5 – mechanical equipment within the separator |
47 |
3-5-1-5-1 – trays or misleading (DISH DEFLECTOR) |
47 |
3-5-1-5-2 – bed sheets and direct elimination of the flow |
48 |
3-5-1-5-3 – where large fluid |
48 |
3-5-1-5-4 – horizontal separator pages |
48 |
3-5-1-5-5-MIST EXTRACTOR |
48 |
3-5-1-5-6 – Vortex breakers |
49 |
3-5-2 – Part II (Instrumentation and Control products)3-5-2-1 – Pressure gauge |
49 |
3-5-2-2 – indicate the liquid level (LEVEL GAUGE)3-5-2-3 – Pressure reducing agents3-5-2-4 – pressure control3-5-2-5 – LEVEL CONTROLLER3-5-2-6 – control valves3-5-3 – Part III3-5-3-1 – Wellhead separators3-5-3-2 – provide necessary pressure in the unit and prevention of pressure drop in pipe flow3-5-3-3 – pump strength3-5-3-4 – duplex filter3-5-3-5 – Horizontal Pump3-5-3-6 – device controller level too3-5-3-7 – pressure in the pressure control device is too3-5-3-8 – separator pressure control device3-5-4 – Part Four3-5-4-1 – (air system)3-6 – Design and operation considerations Gachsaran unit3-6-1 – Pumps3-7 – ConclusionChapter Four:Conclusion on HAZOP Studies Unit3 operation Gachsaran4-1 – Introduction4-2 – recipe suggestions and recommendations4-3 – General Discussion4-4 – hardware suggestions and recommendations4-5- The risk assessment method, WILLIAM FINE4-6 – Matrix of risk and risk acceptance criteria4-7 – as described in Table A-7 Node 44-7-1 – Turbine4-7-2 – Types of turbines4-7-3 – Fluid used in turbines4-7-4 – Oil and gas turbines used in4-7-4-1 – steam turbines4-7-4-2 – Gas Turbine4-8 – History of Gas Turbine4-9 – How do gas turbines work4-10 – In a special category of gas turbines can be classified in two categories4-11 – The advantages of gas turbine4-12 – disadvantages of gas turbine4-13 – Ordering components of gas turbines (gas turbine layouts)4-14 – the effects of turbine inlet temperature and pressure4-15 – re-warming gases in the turbine4-16 – Theory of processes in gas turbine to increase power and efficiency4-17 – Gas Turbine unit Gachsaran4-18 – The unit offers Gachsaran4-18-1 – Node: 1; Deviation high pressure4-18-2 – Node: 1; Deviation low pressure4-18-3 – Node: 2; Deviation high-level liquid4-18-4 – Node: 2; Deviation low level liquid4-18-5 – Node: 2; Deviation high pressure4-18-6 – Node: 3; Deviation high level4-18-7 – Node: 4; Deviation low pressure4-18-8 – Node: 4; Deviation high pressure fuel turbine inlet4-18-9 – Node: 4; Deviation low pressure fuel turbine inlet4-18-10 – Node: 6; Deviation high corrosion4-19 – ConclusionReferencesAttachmentsAttachments: (Qualifications HAZOP) |
49505050505050515151515252525252535354555657575858606061616262626262636364646465656566676767676767686868686869707272 |
Table index
Number323335353538406060616774757679869093100103 |
TitleTable 2-1 – Comparison of the application of HAZOP Study, What-If & Checklist in different processes [6]Table 2-2 – Risk assessment and method names and their symbol [6]Table 2-3 – Definition of quality severely for the damage to humans [7]Table 2-4 – The definition of quality [7]Table 2-5 – Risk acceptance criteria [7]Table 2-6 – AdWords Help using HAZOP [7]Table 2-7 – Software HAZOP[7]Table 4-1 Classification of risk or potential risk factors in ways detrimental WILLIAM FINETable 4-2 classifies severity of risk in WILLIAM FINETable 4-3 Risk matrixTable 4-4 – Specification turbine operation GachsaranTable A -1. HAZOP team members listedTable A – 2. List nodes in HAZOP studiesTable A- 3 lists the deviations in a HAZOP studiesTable A-4 nodes 1 unit of feed inputTable A-5- breakdown of the two favoredTable A-6 nodes separating three tanksTable A-7 to strengthen the four pumps and turbinesTable A-8 nodes, five tanks of liquid turbine fuel consumingTable A-9 the fourth stage 6 exhaust |
Figure index
Number53 |
TitleFigure 3-1 P & ID unit operation Gachsaran 3 |