%40تخفیف

Cultural Influences and Transfer Issues across L1 and L2 Argumentative writing: a Case of Iranian Educational-Cultural Context

تعداد143 صفحه در فایل word

Department of English Language and Literature

M.A. 

Cultural Influences and Transfer Issues across L1 and L2 Argumentative writing: a Case of Iranian Educational-Cultural Context

Abstract

Studies regarding written discourse suggest that what is represented as an effective argumentation is culturally driven and L1 specific rhetorical or argument patterns may influence written argumentation in a second language. The present study, thus, explores the argument preferences of people from the same cultural background across their L1 and L2 texts within a educational-cultural framework. First, participants were given a survey regarding their previous writing instruction that served as the “small cultural context” to contextualize the findings; then, they wrote argumentative essays both in their L1 and L2. The texts were analyzed mainly in terms of argument structures based on Toulmin’s (1958) model of reasoning, Hinkel’s (1997; 2005) indirectness devices, Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals, and language style. Then, stimulated recall interviews were conducted to learn the reasons behind the participants’ use of detected patterns and their transfer. The results indicate common patterns used in both similar and dissimilar ways across L1 and L2, influenced by cultural as well as various other factors.

Keywords: Contrastive rhetoric, Argumentative writing, Transfer, Cultural writing patterns, Second language writing

 

Table of Contents

Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………………. I

Acknowledgement II

Abstract III

List of tables…………………………………………………………………………………… VII

1       Chapter One: Introduction 1

1.1      Overview.. 2

1.2      Statement of the problem.. 9

1.3      Objectives and significance of the study. 11

1.4      Research Questions. 13

1.5      Research Hypothesis. 14

1.6      Limitations of the study. 14

1.7      Definition of key terms. 15

1.8      Organization of the dissertation. 16

2….. Chapter Two: Literature review   18

2.1      Introduction. 19

2.2      Theoretical background. 19

2.2.1       Rhetoric across cultures. 19

2.2.2       Development of Contrastive rhetoric. 21

2.2.3       New perspectives in CR.. 46

2.2.4       The gap in literature and the present study. 52

3….. Chapter Three: Methodology  53

3.1    Introduction…………………………………………………………..54

    3.2     Design………………………………………………………………..54

3.3      Participants. 55

3.4      Instruments. 56

3.5      Procedures. 57

         3.6     Data analysis. 59

4       Chapter Four: results 64

4.1      Introduction. 65

4.2      Similarities across L1 and L2 essays. 66

4.2.1       Explicit statements of claims and the use of indirectness devices. 66

4.2.2       Use of evidence. 69

4.2.3       Use of rebuttals. 73

4.2.4       Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals. 73

4.3      Differences across L1 and L2 essays. 75

4.3.1       Assertiveness devices. 75

4.3.2       Evidence types. 75

4.3.3       Rhetorical questions. 76

4.3.4       Elaborated language style. 77

5….. Chapter Five: Discussions and Conclusion  79

5.1      Introduction. 80

5.2      Discussion. 81

5.2.1       Transfer issues. 81

5.2.2       Dissimilar patterns. 82

5.2.3       Other variables. 83

5.2.4       Writing and its social-cultural influences. 84

5.3     Conclusion……………………………………………………………85

5.4      Implications of the study. 85

5.4.1       Theoretical implications. 86

5.4.2       Pedagogical implications. 88

5.5      Suggestions for further research. 90

  6    References ………………………………………………………………92

       7    Appendices. 112

List of Tables

 

Table 4.1: Participants’ preferences of directness and indirectness devices in L1 and L2…………………………………………………………………………….……..67

Table 4.2: The Mann-Whitney U test results for indirectness and assertiveness devices , rhetorical questions, and adorned language………………………………68

Table 4.3: Common types of evidence in Persian and English essays……………..70

Table 4.4: Similar essays by participants in terms of rhetorical appeals in Persian and English………………………………………………………………………………74

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo