%40تخفیف

THE FACTORS AFFECTING EFL STUDENTS’ SUMMARY WRITING

تعداد123صفحه در فایل word

M.A. Thesis in Teaching English Language

THE FACTORS AFFECTING EFL STUDENTS’ SUMMARY WRITING

Abstract

Although summary writing is one of the most required tasks in EFL milieu, it has been the Cinderella of writing research, and summary research is still in its infancy; since, most of the research conducted in this the area has focused on quality of the product not the skills that may be called on. Thus, this study sought to investigate how different factors, namely, general language proficiency, reading comprehension of the source texts, different aspects of English lexical proficiency, including depth and breadth of vocabulary, and the genre of the source texts contribute to summary writing of Iranian EFL students. In so doing, sixty Iranian students of English wrote summaries of two texts with different genres, narrative and expository; their breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge, English proficiency and reading comprehension of the source text were assessed as well. Participants’ summaries were holistically analyzed from four perspectives: length, Accuracy, Paraphrasing, Focus (inclusion of main ideas), and Conventions (punctuation and grammar). Multiple regression analysis indicated that all the independent variable affected summary performances significantly, except for depth of vocabulary which did not influence narrative summary performance. Conversely, depth of vocabulary affected expository summary performance, however, the results of one-way ANOVA illustrated that there was no difference in expository summary means of students in elementary and intermediate levels of vocabulary depth. It was suggested that there is a threshold in vocabulary depth knowledge, below which, it would not affect expository summary performance much. Therefore, it was concluded that teachers can ameliorate students’ summarization with helping them to improve their reading comprehension and vocabulary breadth and depth knowledge with respect to their proficiency levels. At last, some implications for EFL classrooms were suggested.

Table of contents

Content                                                                                                                 page

Chapter one: Introduction

1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 2

1.1 Preliminaries…………………………………………………………………………………… 2

1.1.1Vocabulary and summary writing…………………………………………….. 3

1.1.1.1 Breadth of vocabulary……………………………………………………… 4

1.1.1.2 Depth of vocabulary…………………………………………………………. 5

1.1.2 L2 Proficiency and summary writing……………………………………….. 6

1.1.3 Reading comprehension and summary writing………………………… 7

1.1.4 Genre of the text (text type) & summary writing……………………… 9

1.2 Statement of problem…………………………………………………………………….. 11

1.3 Objective of the study……………………………………………………………………. 12

1.4 Research Questions ………………………………………………………………………. 13

1.5 Significance of the study……………………………………………………………….. 13

1.6 Definition of the key terms……………………………………………………………. 14

Chapter two:

2.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………… 16

2.1 theoretical aspects…………………………………………………………………………. 17

2.2 Summary writing background and related studies…………………………. 19

2.3 Studies on the relationship between summary writing and

 vocabulary knowledge……………………………………………………………………….. 27

Content                                                                                                                 page

2.4 Studies on the relationship between summary writing

and reading comprehension………………………………………………………………… 29

2.5 Studies on the relationship between summary writing

and L2 language proficiency……………………………………………………………….. 35

2.6 Studies on the relationship between  summary writing

and source text’s genre or text type…………………………………………………….. 38

2.7 Summary……………………………………………………………………………………….. 42

Chapter three:

3.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………… 48

3.1 Participants……………………………………………………………………………………. 48

3.2 Instruments and material……………………………………………………………….. 49

3.2.1 Proficiency test………………………………………………………………………. 49

3.2.2 Vocabulary breadth test…………………………………………………………. 49

3.2.3 Vocabulary depth test…………………………………………………………….. 50

3.2.4 Reading texts………………………………………………………………………….. 50

3.2.5 Two summaries………………………………………………………………………. 51

3.3 Data collection procedures……………………………………………………………. 51

3.4 Data analysis procedure………………………………………………………………… 52

Chapter four:

4.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………… 56

4.1 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………… 56

4.1.1 Multiple regressions for narrative summary writing……………….. 57

4.1.2 Multiple regressions for expository summary writing…………….. 59

4.1.3 Question one………………………………………………………………………….. 61

4.1.2 Questions two…………………………………………………………………………. 62

4.1.3 Question three………………………………………………………………………… 72

4.2 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………….. 74

Content                                                                                                                 page

 

Chapter five:

5.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………… 82

5.1 Summary & conclusion…………………………………………………………………. 82

5.2 Pedagogical implications……………………………………………………………….. 85

5.3 suggestions for further research…………………………………………………….. 86

5.4 Limitations…………………………………………………………………………………….. 87

Reference……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 88

 

APPENDICES

Appendices 1……………………………………………………………………………………… 101

Appendices 2……………………………………………………………………………………… 107

Appendices 3……………………………………………………………………………………… 111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                                                                                     page

Table 3.1 Rubric for assessing summaries……………………………………………….. 53

Table 4.1 Descriptive Statistics……………………………………………………………….. 57

Table 4.2 Effect of all variables on NSP …………………………………………………. 58

Table 4.3 Multiple correlation results for NSP………………………………………… 58

Table 4.4 Coefficients for NSP………………………………………………………………… 59

Table 4.5 One-way ANOVA results on NSP (for proficiency)…………………. 60

Table 4.6 The results of post hoc (scheffe) test for proficiency………………. 60

Table 4.7 One way ANOVA for breadth of vocabulary on NSP……………….. 61

Table 4.8 Post hoc test for vocabulary breadth on NSP……………………………. 62

Table 4.9 One-way ANOVA for NRC………………………………………………………. 63

Table 4.10 Post hoc (scheffe) table for NRC……………………………………………. 63

Table 4.11 Effect of all variables on ESP…………………………………………………. 64

Table 4.12 multiple correlation results for ESP……………………………………….. 64

Table 4.13 coefficient for ESP…………………………………………………………………. 65

Table 4.14 one-way ANOVA on ESP (for proficiency)……………………………. 66

Table 4.15 the results of post hoc (scheffe) test………………………………………. 66

Table 4.16 one-way ANOVA for vocabulary breadth on ESP………………….. 68

Table 4.17 post hoc test for vocabulary breadth……………………………………… 68

Table 4.18 one-way ANOVA results for vocabulary depth on ESP………….. 69

Table 4.19 post hoc test for vocabulary depth…………………………………………. 70

Table 4.20one-way ANOVA for ERC………………………………………………………. 71

Content                                                                                                                 page

Table 4.21 post hoc results for ERC………………………………………………………… 72

Table 4.22 descriptive statistics for summaries……………………………………….. 72

Table 4.23 paired sample t-test………………………………………………………………… 73

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo