%40تخفیف

The Effect of Awareness-Raising Instruction on Oral Communication Strategy Use of Iranian Students with Different Language Proficiency

                                     

تعداد96 صفحه در فایل word

M.A in English Language Teaching

Department of English Language

 

The Effect of Awareness-Raising Instruction on Oral Communication Strategy Use of Iranian Students with Different Language Proficiency Levels

Abstract

Given the influence of metacognitive strategy instruction on the development of oral skills, the present study was set up to incorporate awareness-raising strategies into Iranian EFL classrooms to address the effect of awareness-raising instruction (ARI) on oral communication performance and on oral communication strategy use of Iranian language learners across different proficiency levels. The participants were 180 undergraduate students in one of the universities in Shiraz, Iran who were selected by availability sampling. Using the Oxford placement test, students were grouped as elementary, intermediate and advanced, respectively. Students at each level were randomly placed in the control and experimental groups. In the control class, the instructor followed the traditional procedure of the listening and speaking class, whereas in the experimental class, she introduced the ARI to the classes and taught them how to use and employ metacognitive strategies during communication. The present study had a quasi-experimental design and data were collected using the oral communication task for pretest and posttest which were scored by the Assessment Scale, and the oral communication strategy inventory (OCSI). Descriptive statistics, T-Tests, and One-way ANOVA were performed to analyze the data. The results generally confirmed the positive influence of ARI on oral communication performance and OCSU with the experimental groups utilizing more metacognitive strategies. Significant differences were observed between OCSU of students with different proficiency levels with high proficiency group utilizing higher proportion of negotiation for meaning while speaking, fluency-oriented and social affective strategies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                   

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION.. 1

1.1. Introduction. 2

1.2. Background of the Study. 2

1.3. Statement of the Problem.. 4

1.4. Research Questions. 6

1.5. Research Hypotheses. 7

1.6. Purpose of the Study. 7

1.7. Significance of the Study. 8

1.8. Limitations of the Study. 9

1.9. Definition of Key Terms. 10

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE.. 12

2.1. Introduction. 13

2.2. Communicative and Strategic Competence. 13

2.3. Metacognition and Awareness-raising Strategies. 15

2.4. Taxonomies of Communication Strategies (CSs) and Metacognitive Strategies. 18

2.5. Review of General Empirical Studies. 22

2.6. Review of Empirical Studies in EFL Contexts. 24

2.7. Review of Empirical Studies in the Iranian Educational Context 34

2.8. Summary of Literature Review.. 39

 

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY.. 40

3.1. Introduction. 41

3.2. Participants. 41

3.3. Materials. 42

3.4. Instruments. 43

3.5. Data Collection Procedures. 44

3.6. Data Analysis Procedures. 47

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS. 48

4.1. Introduction. 49

4.2. Results. 49

4.2.1. Effect of Awareness-Raising Instruction on Oral Communication Performance. 49

4.2.2. The Difference between Oral Communication Performance of Students at Different Proficiency Levels 52

4.2.3. Effect of Awareness-Raising Instruction on Iranian Students’ Oral Communication Strategy Use  53

4.2.4. The Difference between Oral Communication Strategy Use of Students at Different Proficiency Levels. 58

4.3. Discussion. 60

 

CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION.. 67

5.1. Introduction. 68

5.2. Summary of the Study. 68

5.3. Conclusions of the Study. 71

5.4. Pedagogical Implications. 73

5.5. Suggestions for Further Research. 74

REFRENCES 76

APPENDIX A.. 84

APPENDIX B.. 85

APPENDIX C.. 86

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

TABLE                                                                                                                     PAGE

 

Table 1: Paired t-test of the participants’ performance in pretest and posttest 49

Table 2: Independent t-test of the participants’ performance in pretest and posttest at different Proficiency levels. 50

Table 3: One-way ANOVA for the difference among oral communication performance of students   with different proficiency levels. 52

Table 4: Frequency and percentage of OCST strategies employed by students across proficiency levels  54

Table 5: Descriptive statistics of the OCSU among the control and experimental groups in  all proficiency levels  58

Table 6: ANOVA for OCSU of the students across proficiency levels. 59

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo