Table of Contents |
|
Acknowledgements |
|
Abstract |
|
1. Chapter One: Introduction |
|
1.1. Introduction |
11 |
1.2. Statement of the Problem |
13 |
1.3. Significance of the Study |
14 |
1.4. The Objectives of the Study |
16 |
1.5. Research Questions |
17 |
1.6. Research Hypotheses |
17 |
1.7. Methodology |
18 |
1.7.1. Participants |
18 |
1.7.2. Instruments |
18 |
1.7.3. Procedure |
18 |
1.7.3.1. Pretest |
18 |
1.7.3.2. Posttest |
19 |
1.7.4. Analysis |
19 |
1.7.5. Definition of Key Terms |
20 |
1.7.5.1. Anxiety |
20 |
1.7.5.2. Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) |
20 |
1.7.5.3. Listening Comprehension |
20 |
1.7.5.4. Self-esteem |
20 |
2. Chapter Two: Review of Literature |
|
2.1. Overview |
22 |
2.2. Computer Assisted Language Learning in teaching English |
24 |
2.2.1. Using the Internet in the classroom |
26 |
2.2.2. Becoming an autonomous and independent foreign language learner when using technology |
28 |
2.2.3. E-mail as a tool in teaching English and practice of English |
30 |
2.2.4. Advantages of using Computer technology in the EFL class |
32 |
2.3. Anxiety |
34 |
2.3.1. Anxiety and language learning |
35 |
2.3.2. Perspective in anxiety research |
36 |
2.3.2.1. Different perspectives: Trait, State and Situation Specific Anxiety |
36 |
2.3.3. Situation specific anxieties and foreign language learning |
39 |
2.3.4. Language Anxiety as a Social Anxiety |
40 |
2.4. Self-Esteem |
40 |
2.4.1. What is self-esteem? |
40 |
2.4.2. Definition of self-esteem |
42 |
2.4.3. Self-esteem and controversy |
42 |
2.4.4. Self-esteem development and school |
43 |
2.4.5. Self-esteem development and school |
44 |
2.5. Listening |
46 |
2.5.1. What is listening? |
47 |
2.5.2. Listening and Technologies |
48 |
2.6. Attitudes of Teachers |
48 |
2.7. Attitudes of Students |
49 |
3. Chapter Three: Methodology |
|
3.1. Overview |
52 |
3.2. Participants |
52 |
3.3. Instrumentation |
52 |
3.3.1. Proficiency Test |
52 |
3.3.2. Pretest |
53 |
3.3.3. Posttest |
53 |
3.3.4. Anxiety questionnaire |
53 |
3.4. Procedure |
54 |
3.4.1. Subject selection |
54 |
3.4.2. Grouping |
54 |
3.4.3. Administering the learning style questionnaire |
55 |
3.4.4. Treatment |
55 |
3.5. Data Analysis |
56 |
3.6. Design |
56 |
4. Chapter Four: Data Analysis and Discussion |
|
4.1. Overview |
59 |
4.2. Homogeneity process |
59 |
4.2.1. Preliminary English Test |
60 |
4.2.2. Homogeneity of Participants |
60 |
4.2.3. Listening Pretest |
60 |
4.3. Data Analysis |
61 |
4.3.1. Descriptive Statistics and Independent T-Test |
61 |
4.3.2. Research Question One |
62 |
4.3.3. Research Question Two |
64 |
4.3.4. Research Question Three |
67 |
4.4. Discussion |
67 |
4.5. Further Discussion |
70 |
5. Chapter Five: Conclusions and Pedagogical Implications |
|
5.1. Overview |
72 |
5.2. Summary of Finding |
72 |
5.3. Conclusions |
73 |
5.4. Implications of the study |
74 |
5.5. Limitationsf the Study |
75 |
5.6. Suggestions for Further Research |
76 |
6. References |
77 |
7. Appendix 1 |
88 |
8. Appendix 2 |
96 |
9. Appendix 3 |
105 |
List of Tables |
|
Table 4.1: Descriptive statistics and independent t-test for the proficiency mean scores |
61 |
Table 4.2: The normal distribution assumption |
62 |
Table 4.3: Descriptive statistics of the scores from listening post-test |
63 |
Table 4.4: ANCOVA analysis of the listening comprehension pre/post-test scores |
63 |
Table 4.5: The estimation of reliability in the anxiety questions of the pilot study |
65 |
Table 4.6: The reliability estimate of the anxiety questions measured in the main study |
65 |
Table 4.7: Descriptive statistics of the groups’ responses to the anxiety questionnaire |
66 |
Table 4.8: Independent samples t-test of the groups responses to the anxiety questionnaire |
66 |
Table 4.9: Descriptive statistics of the groups’ responses to the self-esteem questionnaire |
67 |
List of Figures |
|
Figure 1: Listening comprehension mean-scores from listening post-test |
64 |