%40تخفیف

 A Comparative study of the Impact of Interpretation-based, Task-based, and Mechanical Drills Teaching Methods on Iranian English Language Learners’ Grammatical Development

تعداد85 صفحه در فایل word

Thesis for receiving “M.A” Degree on Teaching English as a Foreign

Language (TEFL)

 A Comparative study of the Impact of Interpretation-based, Task-based, and Mechanical Drills Teaching Methods on Iranian English Language Learners’ Grammatical Development

Abstract

Since grammar has been an important part of language learning, this study was aimed to investigate the impact of three different methods (meaning-based method, task-based method, mechanical drills method) on grammatical development of Iranian EFL learners by teaching conditional sentences. This study was performed in Jahad Daneshgahi Language School of Kermanshah, Iran. The researcher administered a pre-test to see if the learners could make a homogeneous group in terms of proficiency or not. 51 learners were chosen to participate in the study. The learners were studying Top notch book (the third level). The participants were divided into three groups, each group containing 17 learners. The classes were co-educational, containing both male and female learners. Their ages ranged between 17 to 35 years old. This study was done in fall 2014.  Analysis based on ANOVA and post hoc indicated that teaching conditional sentences with task-based instruction in comparison with two other methods, leads to a better grammatical development on Iranian EFL learners. The result of the study indicated that majority of the learners had a better performance on the test based on task-based method treatment.

Key words: Drilling, Authentic tasks, Task-based activities, Comprehensible input

Table of the contents

Title ………………………….…..………………………………….……. I

Abstract ……………………………..…………………………………….III

Dedication …………………………..…………………………………….IV

Acknowledgment ………………………………………………….………V

Chapter One: Introduction …………………………………………….. 1

  • Overview ……………………………………………………………… 2

  • Background of the Study……………………………………………… 2

  • Statement of the Problem …………………………………………….. 3

  • Significance of the Study……………………………………………… 4

  • Research Questions……………………………………………………. 5

  • Research Hypothesis……………………………………………………5

  • Definition of Key Terms………………………………………………. 5

1.7.1 Drilling ……………………………………………………….. 5

1.7.2 Task-based Activities………………………………………….6

1.7.3 Authentic Tasks………………………………………………..6

1.7.4 Comprehensible Input…………………………………………6

Chapter Two: Review of the Literature ……………………………….. 7

2.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………….8

2.2 Theoretical Background of the Study………………………………….8

 2.3 Traditional Grammar Teaching……………………………………….9

2.4 Traditional Grammar Definition…………….………………..………10

 2.5 Modern Grammar……………………………………………….……11

 2.6 Traditional Grammar versus Modern Grammar…………………..….12

 2.7 Deductive and Inductive Approach to Grammar…………………..…14

        2.7.1 Deductive Approach……………………………….…..……….15

         2.7.2  Inductive Approach……………………………………………15

               2.7.2.1  Advantages of Deductive Approach……………………. 16

               2.7.2.2  Disadvantages of Deductive Approach…………..……. 16

               2.7.2.3 Advantages of Inductive Approach…………………..….18

                2.7.2.4  Disadvantages of Inductive Approach………………..…18

                2.7.2.5  Does Inductive Approach have Superiority over Deductive Approach?………………………………………………………………………………………….19

  2.8 Task-based Language Teaching…………………………………..…..20

         2.8.1 Stages of Task-based Activities in Teaching ……………..……23

                2.8.1.1  Pre-task Activities ………………………………….….. 23

                2.8.1.2  Task Activities …………..………………………………23

               2.8.1.3  Post-task Activities ……………………………..………. 23

       2.8.2  Advantages of Task-based Instruction ………………..…………24

       2.8.3  Features of Tasks ………………………………………..……….24

        2.8.4  Categories of Tasks ………………………….…….…….…….. 25

              2.8.4.1  Information-gap Activity……….………………..………..25

              2.8.4.2  Reasoning-gap Activities …………………….….………..25

              2.8.4.3  Opinion-gap Activities…………………….………………25

        2.8.5  Some Important Issues on Tasks ……………….………………26

        2.8.6  Demerits of Task-based Instruction ……………………….……26

 2.9 Mechanical Drills ………………………………………………………27

        2.9.1 What Is Drilling? …………………………………………………27

        2.9.2 Why Drills Can Be Useful? ……………………………………..28

        2.9.3 What Items Should Be Drilled? ………………..………………..29

        2.9.4 When Should We Drill? …………………………………………29

        2.9.5 How Should We Drill? …………………………………………..29

      2.9.6  Drilling Activities for Grammar Teaching ……………………….31

       2.9.7  How Drills Can Be More Interesting to the Class? ………………31

             2.9.7.1  Controlled Activities ………………………………………..32

             2.9.7.2  Less Controlled Activities ………………………………….33

         2.9.7.3  Creative Activities ………….…………………………………33

         2.9.8  Some Important Points about Structural Drills ………………….34

2.10  Interpretation-based Approach …………………………………………34

         2.10.1  Theoretical Rationales of Interpretation-based Approach ………36

         2.10.2  General Principles for the Design of Interpretation Tasks ……..39

Chapter Three: Methodology………………….……………………………42

  3.1  Overview …………………….…………………………….……………43

   3.2  Design of the Study …………………………………………………….43

   3.3  Participants ……………………………………………………………..44

   3.4  Instrumentation …………………………………………………………44

        3.4.1 Test Validity and Reliability………………………………………. 44

        3.4.2 Test Scoring……………………………….………………………..44

   3.5  Procedure ………………………………………………..……………….45

 3.6  Data Analysis ………………………………………….….……………….46

Chapter Four: Data Analysis ……………………………………….…………48

 4.1 Overview ………………………………………………………….………..49

 4.2  Descriptive Statistics …………………………………………….…………50

         4.2.1 Pre-test Result Analysis ………………………………….………….50

         4.2.2 Post-test Result Analysis ……..……………………………………..51

                4.2.2.1 Immediate Post-test Result Analysis …………………………51

                 4.2.2.2 Delayed Post-test Results …………………………………….53

   4.3 Inferential Statistics ……………………………………………………….54

Chapter Five: Conclusion ……………………………………………………. 59

5.1  Overview ………………………………………………….………………..60

5.2  Discussion ………………………………………………………….………60

5.3  Pedagogical Implications ……………………………………………….….62

5.4 Conclusions …………………………………………………………….….  63

5.5 Limitations of the Study ……………………………………………………. 64

5.6 Suggestions for Further Studies …………………………………………….65

قبلا حساب کاربری ایجاد کرده اید؟
گذرواژه خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
Loading...
enemad-logo